il 6 mouse antibody (Abmart Inc)
Structured Review

Il 6 Mouse Antibody, supplied by Abmart Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/il+6+mouse+antibody/pmc13153433-169-45-51?v=Abmart+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Unraveling the anti-neuroinflammatory mechanisms of Cervus cucumis polypeptide injection in Alzheimer’s disease: insights from network pharmacology, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and experimental validation"
Article Title: Unraveling the anti-neuroinflammatory mechanisms of Cervus cucumis polypeptide injection in Alzheimer’s disease: insights from network pharmacology, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and experimental validation
Journal: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2026.1797302
Figure Legend Snippet: Molecular docking analysis of LA with IL-6 in both 3D and 2D frameworks. (A) Surface-form molecular docking. (B) Ribbon-form molecular docking. (C) 2D intermolecular interactions. (D) 3D intermolecular interactions.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: The statistical data of LA and IL-6 simulated by MD simulation. (A) The dynamic stability of the complexes assessment by employing the RMSD analysis. (B) RMSF analysis evaluated the mobility of amino acid residues during the simulation. (C) The stability of the IL-6-LA complex biological system was analyzed along MD trajectories by calculating the structural compactness of biomolecules using the Rg. (D) The surface area of the protein exposed to the solvent was analyzed during the simulation using the SASA plot. (E) Number of hydrogen bonds of the IL-6-LA complex formed during the computational simulations. (F) The conformational behavior of the IL-6-LA complex was employed by Gibbs FEL.
Techniques Used: Solvent
Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of CCPI on pro-inflammatory cytokines in the AD model cells. (A) CCPI down-regulated the levels of IL-6. (B) CCPI down-regulated the levels of IL-1β. (C) CCPI down-regulated the levels of TNF-α. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 6). ### p < 0.001, ## p < 0.01, # p < 0.05 compared with the Control group. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05 compared with the AD group.
Techniques Used: Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Effects of CCPI on the expression of IL-6/STAT3/VEGF signaling pathway. (A) Western blot showed the expression of the IL-6/STAT3/VEGF pathway after CCPI treatment. (B–D) Quantitative analysis of the IL-6/GAPDH, STAT3/GAPDH, and VEGF/GAPDH ratios in the CCPI-treated groups, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3). ### p < 0.001 vs. ontrol group; *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 vs. AD model group.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of LA on IL-6 levels in the AD model cells as determined by ELISA. (A) Chemical structure of LA. (B) Dose–response graphs showing cell viability after treatment with 0, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 160 μM LA for 24 h. (C) Effects of 10, 40, and 80 μM LA on cell viability in the AD model cells. (D) LA suppresses IL-6 levels in the AD model cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 6). ### p < 0.001 vs. the Control group; *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, and ns p > 0.05 compared with the AD group; compared with the multiple-group, ns p > 0.05.
Techniques Used: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of the effects of CCPI and LA on IL-6 secretion, STAT3 phosphorylation, and the expression of markers associated with pro-inflammation (iNOS) and anti-inflammation/repair (CD206) in AD model cells. (A) IL-6 levels in the AD model cells were measured by ELISA. (B) Western blot showed the expression of iNOS, CD206, STAT3 phosphorylation, and STAT3 after CCPI and LA treatment. (C–E) Quantitative analysis of the iNOS/GAPDH, CD206/GAPDH, and STAT3 phosphorylation/STAT3 ratios in the CCPI and LA-treated groups, respectively. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3). ### p < 0.001 vs. control group; *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 vs. AD model group; ns p > 0.05 compared with the CCPI group; compared with the LA group, ns p > 0.05.
Techniques Used: Comparison, Phospho-proteomics, Expressing, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Western Blot, Control
